linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] nohz: Print final full dynticks CPUs range on boot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 28 Mar 2013 22:02:38 -0400
From:	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Geoff Levand <geoff@...radead.org>,
	Gilad Ben Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>,
	Hakan Akkan <hakanakkan@...il.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
	Li Zhong <zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] nohz: Print final full dynticks CPUs range on boot

[Re: [PATCH 2/4] nohz: Print final full dynticks CPUs range on boot] On 29/03/2013 (Fri 01:39) Frederic Weisbecker wrote:

> 2013/3/29 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>:
> > [Re: [PATCH 2/4] nohz: Print final full dynticks CPUs range on boot] On 28/03/2013 (Thu 08:40) Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > +   cpulist_scnprintf(nohz_ext_buf, sizeof(nohz_ext_buf), nohz_extended_mask);
> >> > +   pr_info("NO_HZ: Experimental full dynticks CPUs: %s.\n", nohz_ext_buf);
> >>
> >> I'd suggest removing the 'experimental' word. We are not sending anything
> >> experimental to Linus: we'll send something that is tested and that we
> >> expect to not break anything. (and which we'll fix if it does)
> >
> > In that case, should we vector a patch through PaulM to clobber these too?
> >
> > $ git grep xperiment |grep rcu
> > kernel/rcutree_plugin.h: printk(KERN_INFO "\tExperimental boot-time adjustment of leaf fanout to %d.\n", rcu_fanout_leaf);
> > kernel/rcutree_plugin.h: pr_info("\tExperimental no-CBs CPUs: %s.\n", nocb_buf);
> > kernel/rcutree_plugin.h: pr_info("\tExperimental polled no-CBs CPUs.\n");
> 
> Hehe, that's indeed what I inspired from ;-)

I was guessing exactly that, which is why I mentioned it.  :)

P.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/