linux-kernel - Re: r8169 auto speed down issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 29 Mar 2013 08:20:56 +0100
From:	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To:	hayeswang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	bowgotsai@...gle.com, "'Ryankao'" <ryankao@...ltek.com>
Subject: Re: r8169 auto speed down issue

hayeswang <hayeswang@...ltek.com> :
> Francois Romieu [mailto:romieu@...zoreil.com] 
> [...]
> > Your description suggests that testing against the link 
> > partner ability to work at 10M instead of testing for
                                   ^^^^^^^^^^ -> "and"
> > tp->link_ok could be good enough.

As a policy we may assume that capabilities of the link partner won't
change after a link loss event - and there is currently no way we can
change this policy - but it won't always work as expected (especially
if "expected == automagically").

[...]
> Furthermore, should it not speed down without linking, even though the cable
> would be plugged after suspending or shutdowning?

I don't get your point. Can you reformulate ?

-- 
Ueimor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/