| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:29:44 -0700 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com> To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr> Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>, florianschandinat <FlorianSchandinat@....de>, linux-fbdev <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, "backports@...r.kernel.org" <backports@...r.kernel.org>, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "rodrigo.vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>, "rafael.j.wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] compat/compat-drivers/linux-next: fb skip_vt_switch On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr> wrote: >> > I looked in today's linux-next, and there seems to be only one >> > initialization of this field, to true, and one test of this field. So >> > perhaps the case for setting the field to false just isn't needed. >> >> Oh sorry now I get what you mean! I thought about this -- and yes I >> decided to not add a bool false setting for the structure field given >> that the assumption is this would not be something dynamic, and data >> structure would be kzalloc()'d so by default they are 0. > > What do you do about the test, though? Return the value. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists