lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 31 Mar 2013 08:15:14 +0200
From:	Danny Baumann <dannybaumann@....de>
To:	Artem Savkov <artem.savkov@...il.com>
CC:	aaron.lu@...el.com, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi/video: lcd_get_level_current doen't return current level



Artem Savkov <artem.savkov@...il.com> schrieb:

>acpi_video_device_lcd_get_level_current() called
>acpi_video_bqc_value_to_level()
>with "*level" as a second argument, resulting in level being returned
>based on
>initial input, not current brightness, breaking backlight controls.

I don't think this change is correct. As level was passed as parameter into the evaluation of _BQC, *level contains the AML returned brightness level afterwards, so it's correct to use it as an input to acpi_video_bqc_value_to_level(). Actually, the whole point of acpi_video_device_lcd_get_level_current() is to update device->brightness->curr, so it doesn't make sense to me to use it in that function.

What's the exact problem this patch tries to solve?

Regards,

Danny
Hi,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ