linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] cpufreq: covert the cpufreq_data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 1 Apr 2013 19:56:18 -0500
From:	Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] cpufreq: covert the cpufreq_data_lock to a
	spinlock

On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 10:41:27PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, April 01, 2013 03:11:09 PM Nathan Zimmer wrote:
> > This eliminates the rest of the contention found in __cpufreq_cpu_get.
> > I am not seeing a way to use the rcu so we will have to make due with a
> > rwlock for now.
> > 
> > Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
> > Signed-off-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>
> 
> I've already applied this one.
> 
> Can you please check if the version in my tree is OK?
> 
> Rafael
> 

Nope, the previous version was too different, probably best to just replace it.
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/