linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 02/11] USB: dwc3: Adjust runtime pm to allow autosuspend

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 3 Apr 2013 11:17:04 +0300
From:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To:	Vivek Gautam <gautamvivek1987@...il.com>
CC:	<balbi@...com>, Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@...sung.com>,
	<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	<sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>, <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	<kgene.kim@...sung.com>, <kishon@...com>, <dianders@...omium.org>,
	<t.figa@...sung.com>, <p.paneri@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/11] USB: dwc3: Adjust runtime pm to allow
 autosuspend

Hi,

On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 11:35:43AM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> >> The current code in the dwc3 probe effectively disables runtime pm
> >> from ever working because it calls a get() that was never put() until
> >> device removal.  Change the runtime pm code to match the standard
> >> formula and allow runtime pm to function.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@...sung.com>
> >> CC: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c |    8 +++++++-
> >>  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> >> index e2325ad..3a6993c 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> >> @@ -491,6 +491,11 @@ static int dwc3_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>
> >>       dwc->needs_fifo_resize = of_property_read_bool(node, "tx-fifo-resize");
> >>
> >> +     /* Setting device state as 'suspended' initially,
> >
> > wrong comment style.
> Yea :-(  will fix this.
> 
> >
> >> +      * to make sure we know device state prior to
> >> +      * pm_runtime_enable
> >> +      */
> >> +     pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev);
> >
> > didn't Alan mention this should be done at the Bus level ? In that case,
> > shouldn't you have call pm_runtime_set_active/suspended() based on
> > DT's status=okay or status=disabled ? Or something similar ?
> 
> True, we should be doing this at bus level. But he did also mention to
> let pm core
> know of the state of the device before enabling the runtime pm. Right ?
> Moreover immediately after pm_runtime_enable(), we do pm_runtime_get_sync()
> so that device comes to active state.
> I am possibly missing things out here, not able to grab this whole
> picture completely :-(
> 
> Wouldn't DT's status=disabled actually be disabling the device as a whole ?
> So, how much will runtime power management on the device be affecting ?

indeed, maybe we can keep it like this, but it would be nice to have OF
core handle this for us based on whatever data.

-- 
balbi

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)