linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: remove superfluous optimization in pinctrl_select_state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 3 Apr 2013 14:26:41 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
Cc:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: remove superfluous optimization in pinctrl_select_state_locked

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Richard Genoud
<richard.genoud@...il.com> wrote:

> As Stephen Warren suggested, checking first if the setting->node entry
> is the first in the list or not is superfluous, as it is checked again
> in the list_for_each_entry bellow.
> So, remove it, the code will be simpler and lighter !
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
> ---
> If can also be squashed whit commit:
> 3102a76cfbf9ac4ae0cf54c7452f7ba4292a4760
> "pinctrl: disable and free setting in select_state in case of error"
> (But there will be a conflict on "if (old_state)" vs "FIXME comment")

Applied with Stephen's Reviewed tag.

Thanks,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/