linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/block/xen-blkback: preq.dev is used without initialized

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:34:16 +0100
From:	"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To:	"William Dauchy" <wdauchy@...il.com>
Cc:	"Chen Gang" <gang.chen@...anux.com>,
	"roger.pau" <roger.pau@...rix.com>,
	"Stefano Stabellini" <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
	"xen-devel" <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
	"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	"dgdegra" <dgdegra@...ho.nsa.gov>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/block/xen-blkback: preq.dev is used
 without initialized

>>> On 03.04.13 at 15:56, William Dauchy <wdauchy@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com> wrote:
>> ChangeLog-3.8.3 for example has
> 
> oh sorry, you are right. I wasn't looking is the 3.8.x branch.
> The thing is, the revert seems present only in 3.8.x branch. For
> example in 3.4.x the last patch is still 01c681d
> Should we consider this normal or is it a mistake?

I think it is a mistake, but ultimately it's Konrad's call.

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/