linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] uretprobes: Return uprobes implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 4 Apr 2013 09:02:27 +0530
From:	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Josh Stone <jistone@...hat.com>,
	Frank Eigler <fche@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, adrian.m.negreanu@...el.com,
	Torsten.Polle@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] uretprobes: Return uprobes implementation

On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 07:45:52PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 04/03, Anton Arapov wrote:

...

> Looks fine to me. I am going to add this to
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/oleg/misc uprobes/core
> 
> Ananth. "4/9 uretprobes/ppc" looks "obviously correct", but could you
> please review and ack/nack ?

Oleg,
4/9 is fine; I have acked it.

Ananth

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/