linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5 0/4] cpufreq: exynos5440: support for cpufreq driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 05 Apr 2013 14:38:26 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@...sung.com>
Cc:	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@...aro.org>,
	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
	Inderpal Singh <inderpal.singh@...aro.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/4] cpufreq: exynos5440: support for cpufreq driver

On Thursday, March 28, 2013 01:35:18 PM Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> Submitting the V5 version of exynos5440 cpufreq driver. This patchset addresses
> all the coding and design concerns raised especially by Viresh.
> 
> Changes in V5:
> * Removed the unnecessary DT look up entry from mach-exynos5-dt.c.
> * Fixed all coding and comments issue raised by Viresh.
> 
> Changes in V4:
> * Added dev_err logs instead of pr_err.
> * Used the devm_ioremap_resource API.
> * Implemented several coding guidelines and minor error comments from Sylwester,
>   Russell and Viresh.
> 
> Changes in V3:
> * Converted the driver to probe based as suggested by Viresh. This is also
>   beneficial for multiplatform kernel.
> * Other coding guidelines related changes.
> * Moved the DT node outside cpu0 node as the driver is now a platform
>   driver.
> 
> Changes in V2:
> * Added OPP library support to parse DT parameters.
> * Removed a hack to handle interrupts in bootup.
> * Implemented other review comments from Viresh and Inder.
> 
> All these patches are dependent on Thomas Abraham common clock patches.
> (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg15860.html)
> This whole patch series is based on 3.9-rc4.
> 
> Amit Daniel Kachhap (4):
>   cpufreq: exynos: Add cpufreq driver for exynos5440
>   cpufreq: exynos: Remove error return even if no soc is found
>   arm: exynos: Enable OPP library support for exynos5440
>   arm: dts: Add cpufreq controller node for Exynos5440 SoC
> 
>  .../bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-exynos5440.txt        |   28 ++
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi                  |   12 +
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig                       |    2 +
>  drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm                        |    9 +
>  drivers/cpufreq/Makefile                           |    1 +
>  drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c                   |    2 +-
>  drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c               |  474 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  7 files changed, 527 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-exynos5440.txt
>  create mode 100644 drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c

Is this for me or the Samsung tree?

If it's for me, I need ACKs from the Samsung tree maintainers.  Also, please
address the Viresh's comments.

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/