linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/9] uretprobes: Introduce uprobe_consumer->ret

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 7 Apr 2013 17:07:23 +0530
From:	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>
Cc:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Josh Stone <jistone@...hat.com>,
	Frank Eigler <fche@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	adrian.m.negreanu@...el.com, Torsten.Polle@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/9] uretprobes: Introduce
 uprobe_consumer->ret_handler()

* Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com> [2013-04-03 18:00:31]:

> Enclose return probes implementation, introduce ->ret_handler() and update
> existing code to rely on ->handler() *and* ->ret_handler() for uprobe and
> uretprobe respectively.
> 
> v1 changes:
> * add bp_vaddr argument to ->ret_handler()
> 
> RFCv5 changes:
> * don't remove uprobe in case there are no uprobe consumer(handler),
>   see handler_chain() changes.
> 
> RFCv3 changes: (the patch is introduced in v3)
> * check whether at least one of the consumer's handlers were set.
> * a 'TODO' cap that will be removed once return probes be implemented.
> * introduce ->ret_handler().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>

Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

> ---
>  include/linux/uprobes.h |  3 +++
>  kernel/events/uprobes.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/uprobes.h b/include/linux/uprobes.h
> index 02b83db..4042cad 100644
> --- a/include/linux/uprobes.h
> +++ b/include/linux/uprobes.h
> @@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ enum uprobe_filter_ctx {
> 
>  struct uprobe_consumer {
>  	int (*handler)(struct uprobe_consumer *self, struct pt_regs *regs);
> +	int (*ret_handler)(struct uprobe_consumer *self,
> +				unsigned long func,
> +				struct pt_regs *regs);
>  	bool (*filter)(struct uprobe_consumer *self,
>  				enum uprobe_filter_ctx ctx,
>  				struct mm_struct *mm);
> diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> index 21d8a65..27c964b 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> @@ -815,6 +815,14 @@ int uprobe_register(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *
>  	struct uprobe *uprobe;
>  	int ret;
> 
> +	/* Uprobe must have at least one set consumer */
> +	if (!uc->handler && !uc->ret_handler)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/* TODO: Implement return probes */
> +	if (uc->ret_handler)
> +		return -ENOSYS;
> +
>  	/* Racy, just to catch the obvious mistakes */
>  	if (offset > i_size_read(inode))
>  		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -1473,10 +1481,13 @@ static void handler_chain(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
> 
>  	down_read(&uprobe->register_rwsem);
>  	for (uc = uprobe->consumers; uc; uc = uc->next) {
> -		int rc = uc->handler(uc, regs);
> +		int rc = 0;
> 
> -		WARN(rc & ~UPROBE_HANDLER_MASK,
> -			"bad rc=0x%x from %pf()\n", rc, uc->handler);
> +		if (uc->handler) {
> +			rc = uc->handler(uc, regs);
> +			WARN(rc & ~UPROBE_HANDLER_MASK,
> +				"bad rc=0x%x from %pf()\n", rc, uc->handler);
> +		}
>  		remove &= rc;
>  	}
> 
> -- 
> 1.8.1.4
> 

-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/