linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 3/4] block: queue work on unbound wq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 8 Apr 2013 16:32:48 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
	robin.randhawa@....com, Steve.Bannister@....com,
	Liviu.Dudau@....com, charles.garcia-tobin@....com,
	arvind.chauhan@....com, davem@...emloft.net, airlied@...hat.com,
	axboe@...nel.dk, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
	mingo@...hat.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/4] block: queue work on unbound wq

On 4 April 2013 03:24, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> Not a call, probably a module_param() so that it can be switched
> on/off during boot.  You can make the param writable so that it can be
> flipped run-time but updating existing workqueues would be non-trivial
> and I don't think it's gonna be worthwhile.

It might be better if we make it read only and so don't try ugly stuff on the
fly. Might be good for testing but not otherwise..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/