linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] x86: don't show trace beyond show

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 8 Apr 2013 10:57:34 -0700
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org,
	rth@...ddle.net, linux@....linux.org.uk, msalter@...hat.com,
	starvik@...s.com, dhowells@...hat.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
	benh@...nel.crashing.org, takata@...ux-m32r.org,
	geert@...ux-m68k.org, james.hogan@...tec.com, monstr@...str.eu,
	ralf@...ux-mips.org, jonas@...thpole.se, rkuo@...eaurora.org,
	schwidefsky@...ibm.com, liqin.chen@...plusct.com,
	davem@...emloft.net, lethal@...ux-sh.org, vgupta@...opsys.com,
	chris@...kel.net, cmetcalf@...era.com, ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp,
	gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn, jdike@...toit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] x86: don't show trace beyond show_stack(NULL, NULL)

Hello, Ingo.

On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 06:08:11PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >  void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *sp)
> >  {
> > -	show_stack_log_lvl(task, NULL, sp, 0, "");
> > +	unsigned long bp = 0;
> > +	unsigned long stack;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Stack frames below this one aren't interesting.  Don't show them
> > +	 * if we're printing for %current.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (!sp && (!task || task == current)) {
> > +		sp = &stack;
> > +		bp = stack_frame(current, NULL);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	show_stack_log_lvl(task, NULL, sp, bp, "");
> 
> Hm, show_regs() has a similar problem AFAICS.

Doesn't seem so.  show_regs() have pt_regs which gets passed to
dump_trace() and then used to determine the frame being dumped.
e.g. BUG() takes pt_regs from the faulting frame and thus doesn't show
anything beyond it.

 kernel BUG at /work/os/work/kernel/workqueue.c:4841!
 invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
 Modules linked in:
 CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.9.0-rc1-work+ #7
 Hardware name: empty empty/S3992, BIOS 080011  10/26/2007
 task: ffff88007c85e040 ti: ffff88007c860000 task.ti: ffff88007c860000
 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8234a07e>]  [<ffffffff8234a07e>] init_workqueues+0x4/0x6
 RSP: 0000:ffff88007c861ec8  EFLAGS: 00010246
 RAX: ffff88007c861fd8 RBX: ffffffff824466a8 RCX: 0000000000000001
 RDX: 0000000000000046 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffff8234a07a
 RBP: ffff88007c861ec8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffffff8234a07a
 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
 FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88007dc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
 CR2: ffff88015f7ff000 CR3: 00000000021f1000 CR4: 00000000000007f0
 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
 Stack:
  ffff88007c861ef8 ffffffff81000312 ffffffff824466a8 ffff88007c85e650
  0000000000000003 0000000000000000 ffff88007c861f38 ffffffff82335e5d
  ffff88007c862080 ffffffff8223d8c0 ffff88007c862080 ffffffff81c47760
 Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff81000312>] do_one_initcall+0x122/0x170
  [<ffffffff82335e5d>] kernel_init_freeable+0x9b/0x1c8
  [<ffffffff81c47760>] ? rest_init+0x140/0x140
  [<ffffffff81c4776e>] kernel_init+0xe/0xf0
  [<ffffffff81c6be9c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
  [<ffffffff81c47760>] ? rest_init+0x140/0x140
  ...


Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/