linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: si5351: Add gapless tuning for SI5351 PLL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 09 Apr 2013 15:49:37 +0200
From:	Michal Bachraty <michal.bachraty@...eamunlimited.com>
To:	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
Cc:	grant.likely@...retlab.ca, rob.herring@...xeda.com,
	rob@...dley.net, mturquette@...aro.org,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: si5351: Add gapless tuning for SI5351 PLL

Hi Sebastian,

> does gapless tuning have any constraints? Can we use it for all rate
> changes or determine the
> need for pll reset by rate offset?

Today I made some test measurements ( switching from 22.5MHz to 32kHz, then to 
50MHz, then to 1MHz) with good results: without any gaps and any side 
frequences.  So there are no constrains, and we can use it for any frequences. 

Best,
Michal

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/