linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 4/7] uprobes/tracing: Make uprobe_{trace,perf}

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 9 Apr 2013 21:32:35 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/7] uprobes/tracing: Make uprobe_{trace,perf}_print()
	uretprobe-friendly

Change uprobe_trace_print() and uprobe_perf_print() to check
is_ret_probe() and fill ring_buffer_event accordingly.

Also change uprobe_trace_func() and uprobe_perf_func() to not
_print() if is_ret_probe() is true. Note that we keep ->handler()
nontrivial even for uretprobe, we need this for filtering and for
other potential extensions.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Tested-by: Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c |   34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
index 72aa45e..0ed99a2 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
@@ -516,15 +516,22 @@ static void uprobe_trace_print(struct trace_uprobe *tu,
 	int size, i;
 	struct ftrace_event_call *call = &tu->call;
 
-	size = SIZEOF_TRACE_ENTRY(false) + tu->size;
+	size = SIZEOF_TRACE_ENTRY(is_ret_probe(tu));
 	event = trace_current_buffer_lock_reserve(&buffer, call->event.type,
-						  size, 0, 0);
+						  size + tu->size, 0, 0);
 	if (!event)
 		return;
 
 	entry = ring_buffer_event_data(event);
-	entry->vaddr[0] = instruction_pointer(regs);
-	data = DATAOF_TRACE_ENTRY(entry, false);
+	if (is_ret_probe(tu)) {
+		entry->vaddr[0] = func;
+		entry->vaddr[1] = instruction_pointer(regs);
+		data = DATAOF_TRACE_ENTRY(entry, true);
+	} else {
+		entry->vaddr[0] = instruction_pointer(regs);
+		data = DATAOF_TRACE_ENTRY(entry, false);
+	}
+
 	for (i = 0; i < tu->nr_args; i++)
 		call_fetch(&tu->args[i].fetch, regs, data + tu->args[i].offset);
 
@@ -535,7 +542,8 @@ static void uprobe_trace_print(struct trace_uprobe *tu,
 /* uprobe handler */
 static int uprobe_trace_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
-	uprobe_trace_print(tu, 0, regs);
+	if (!is_ret_probe(tu))
+		uprobe_trace_print(tu, 0, regs);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -784,7 +792,7 @@ static void uprobe_perf_print(struct trace_uprobe *tu,
 	void *data;
 	int size, rctx, i;
 
-	size = SIZEOF_TRACE_ENTRY(false);
+	size = SIZEOF_TRACE_ENTRY(is_ret_probe(tu));
 	size = ALIGN(size + tu->size + sizeof(u32), sizeof(u64)) - sizeof(u32);
 	if (WARN_ONCE(size > PERF_MAX_TRACE_SIZE, "profile buffer not large enough"))
 		return;
@@ -795,8 +803,15 @@ static void uprobe_perf_print(struct trace_uprobe *tu,
 		goto out;
 
 	ip = instruction_pointer(regs);
-	entry->vaddr[0] = ip;
-	data = DATAOF_TRACE_ENTRY(entry, false);
+	if (is_ret_probe(tu)) {
+		entry->vaddr[0] = func;
+		entry->vaddr[1] = ip;
+		data = DATAOF_TRACE_ENTRY(entry, true);
+	} else {
+		entry->vaddr[0] = ip;
+		data = DATAOF_TRACE_ENTRY(entry, false);
+	}
+
 	for (i = 0; i < tu->nr_args; i++)
 		call_fetch(&tu->args[i].fetch, regs, data + tu->args[i].offset);
 
@@ -812,7 +827,8 @@ static int uprobe_perf_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	if (!uprobe_perf_filter(&tu->consumer, 0, current->mm))
 		return UPROBE_HANDLER_REMOVE;
 
-	uprobe_perf_print(tu, 0, regs);
+	if (!is_ret_probe(tu))
+		uprobe_perf_print(tu, 0, regs);
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.5.5.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/