linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:40:32 +0200
From:	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 10

On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20130409:
>
> The vfs tree lost its build failure.
>

Beyond build-failures in vfs-next [0] and [1], it was not bootable
(see [2] till [4])!
This is now all fixed, thanks to all involved people!

$ cat /proc/version
Linux version 3.9.0-rc6-next20130410-1-iniza-small
(sedat.dilek@...il.com@...box) (gcc version 4.6.3 (Ubuntu/Linaro
4.6.3-1ubuntu5) ) #1 SMP Wed Apr 10 11:55:58 CEST 2013

NOTE: There still exists the NULL-pointer-deref in cpufreq for me on
Intel SandyBridge CPU (see [5]) on reboot and when CPUs get offline.

- Sedat -

[0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/7/229
[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=136552249527170&w=2
[2] http://marc.info/?t=136545773000008&r=1&w=2
[3] http://marc.info/?t=136545603700003&r=1&w=2
[4] http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=136552718229123&w=2
[5] http://marc.info/?t=136551588400003&r=1&w=2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/