linux-kernel - Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] fuse: process direct IO asynchronously

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:43:07 +0400
From:	"Maxim V. Patlasov" <mpatlasov@...allels.com>
To:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
CC:	<dev@...allels.com>, <xemul@...allels.com>,
	<fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<devel@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] fuse: process direct IO asynchronously

Hi,

04/11/2013 08:07 PM, Miklos Szeredi пишет:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Maxim V. Patlasov
> <mpatlasov@...allels.com> wrote:
>> Hi Miklos,
>>
>> Any feedback would be highly appreciated.
> What is the order of all these patchsets with regards to each other?

They are logically independent, so I formed them to be applied w/o each 
other. There might be some minor collisions between them (if you try to 
apply one patch-set on the top of another). So, as soon as you get one 
of them to fuse-next, I'll update others to be applied smoothly. Either 
we can settle down some order now, and I'll do it in advance.

Thanks,
Maxim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/