linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] net: mv643xx_eth: use managed devm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 11 Apr 2013 13:15:25 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com
Cc:	buytenh@...tstofly.org, andrew@...n.ch, jason@...edaemon.net,
	florian@...nwrt.org, sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: mv643xx_eth: use managed devm_kzalloc

From: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 08:53:19 +0200

> On 04/11/2013 05:39 AM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Sebastian Hesselbarth<sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
>> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:42:07 +0200
>>
>>> This patch moves shared private data kzalloc to managed devm_kzalloc
>>> and
>>> cleans now unneccessary kfree and error handling.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth<sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
>>
>> This doesn't apply cleanly to the net-next tree.
> 
> Yeah. I sent two single patches for mv643xx_eth, while they should
> have been sent together in one patch set. I'll prepare a cover letter
> and resend both in one patch set.

If you don't number the patches or mention the dependency, there is no way
for people to know.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/