linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/10] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd V2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 12 Apr 2013 20:52:04 +0100
From:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To:	Zlatko Calusic <zcalusic@...sync.net>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
	Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	dormando <dormando@...ia.net>,
	Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@....com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd V2

On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 08:40:04PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:55:13PM +0200, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
> > On 09.04.2013 13:06, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > <SNIP>
> >
> > - The only slightly negative thing I observed is that with the patch
> > applied kswapd burns 10x - 20x more CPU. So instead of about 15
> > seconds, it has now spent more than 4 minutes on one particular
> > machine with a quite steady load (after about 12 days of uptime).
> > Admittedly, that's still nothing too alarming, but...
> > 
> 
> Would you happen to know what circumstances trigger the higher CPU
> usage?
> 

There is also a slight possibility it has been fixed in V3 by the
proportional scanning changes. In my own parallelio tests I got the
following kswapd CPU times from top.

3.9.0-rc6-vanilla           0:05.21
3.9.0-rc6-lessdisrupt-v2r11 0:07.44
3.9.0-rc6-lessdisrupt-v3r6  0:03.21

In v2, I did see slightly higher CPU usage but it was reduced in v3. For
a general set of page reclaim tests I got

3.9.0-rc6-vanilla-micro     3:09.51
3.9.0-rc6-lessdisrupt-v2r11 2:57.78
3.9.0-rc6-lessdisrupt-v3r6  1:10.05

In that case, v2 was comparable so unfortunately I was never seeing the
10-20x more CPU that you got.

Thanks.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/