| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 16:32:30 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, darren@...art.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, sbw@....edu,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/8] rcu: Move code to apply callback-numbering simplifications
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
The addition of callback numbering allows combining the detection of the
ends of old grace periods and the beginnings of new grace periods. This
commit moves code to set the stage for this combining.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcutree.c | 118 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index bc3eac5..8ebc3ff 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -975,65 +975,6 @@ void rcu_cpu_stall_reset(void)
}
/*
- * Update CPU-local rcu_data state to record the newly noticed grace period.
- * This is used both when we started the grace period and when we notice
- * that someone else started the grace period. The caller must hold the
- * ->lock of the leaf rcu_node structure corresponding to the current CPU,
- * and must have irqs disabled.
- */
-static void __note_new_gpnum(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
-{
- if (rdp->gpnum != rnp->gpnum) {
- /*
- * If the current grace period is waiting for this CPU,
- * set up to detect a quiescent state, otherwise don't
- * go looking for one.
- */
- rdp->gpnum = rnp->gpnum;
- trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name, rdp->gpnum, "cpustart");
- rdp->passed_quiesce = 0;
- rdp->qs_pending = !!(rnp->qsmask & rdp->grpmask);
- zero_cpu_stall_ticks(rdp);
- }
-}
-
-static void note_new_gpnum(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
-{
- unsigned long flags;
- struct rcu_node *rnp;
-
- local_irq_save(flags);
- rnp = rdp->mynode;
- if (rdp->gpnum == ACCESS_ONCE(rnp->gpnum) || /* outside lock. */
- !raw_spin_trylock(&rnp->lock)) { /* irqs already off, so later. */
- local_irq_restore(flags);
- return;
- }
- __note_new_gpnum(rsp, rnp, rdp);
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
-}
-
-/*
- * Did someone else start a new RCU grace period start since we last
- * checked? Update local state appropriately if so. Must be called
- * on the CPU corresponding to rdp.
- */
-static int
-check_for_new_grace_period(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
-{
- unsigned long flags;
- int ret = 0;
-
- local_irq_save(flags);
- if (rdp->gpnum != rsp->gpnum) {
- note_new_gpnum(rsp, rdp);
- ret = 1;
- }
- local_irq_restore(flags);
- return ret;
-}
-
-/*
* Initialize the specified rcu_data structure's callback list to empty.
*/
static void init_callback_list(struct rcu_data *rdp)
@@ -1350,6 +1291,45 @@ __rcu_process_gp_end(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_dat
}
/*
+ * Update CPU-local rcu_data state to record the newly noticed grace period.
+ * This is used both when we started the grace period and when we notice
+ * that someone else started the grace period. The caller must hold the
+ * ->lock of the leaf rcu_node structure corresponding to the current CPU,
+ * and must have irqs disabled.
+ */
+static void __note_new_gpnum(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
+{
+ if (rdp->gpnum != rnp->gpnum) {
+ /*
+ * If the current grace period is waiting for this CPU,
+ * set up to detect a quiescent state, otherwise don't
+ * go looking for one.
+ */
+ rdp->gpnum = rnp->gpnum;
+ trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name, rdp->gpnum, "cpustart");
+ rdp->passed_quiesce = 0;
+ rdp->qs_pending = !!(rnp->qsmask & rdp->grpmask);
+ zero_cpu_stall_ticks(rdp);
+ }
+}
+
+static void note_new_gpnum(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+ struct rcu_node *rnp;
+
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ rnp = rdp->mynode;
+ if (rdp->gpnum == ACCESS_ONCE(rnp->gpnum) || /* outside lock. */
+ !raw_spin_trylock(&rnp->lock)) { /* irqs already off, so later. */
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+ return;
+ }
+ __note_new_gpnum(rsp, rnp, rdp);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
+}
+
+/*
* Advance this CPU's callbacks, but only if the current grace period
* has ended. This may be called only from the CPU to whom the rdp
* belongs.
@@ -1372,6 +1352,26 @@ rcu_process_gp_end(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
}
/*
+ * Did someone else start a new RCU grace period start since we last
+ * checked? Update local state appropriately if so. Must be called
+ * on the CPU corresponding to rdp.
+ */
+static int
+check_for_new_grace_period(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ if (rdp->gpnum != rsp->gpnum) {
+ note_new_gpnum(rsp, rdp);
+ ret = 1;
+ }
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/*
* Do per-CPU grace-period initialization for running CPU. The caller
* must hold the lock of the leaf rcu_node structure corresponding to
* this CPU.
--
1.8.1.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists