lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 14 Apr 2013 18:34:51 +0200
From:	Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	arnd@...db.de, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com,
	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>, Dan Williams <djbw@...com>,
	Per Forlin <per.forlin@...ricsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Do not configure channels
 during an channel allocation

2013/4/12 Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>:
> So I need to devise another way, as this function cannot be called
> here either. Using the dmaengine API, allocating a channel and
> configuring it are to be completed using different calls. Using the
> API correctly, there is no way the driver can setup the channel
> with all of the relevant information during allocation time.
>
> The steps are as follows:
>
> dma_request_channel() - here we only allot a channel number and
>                         allocate the appropriate resources for the
>                         channel.
>
> dma_slave_config()    - this is where we're meant to configure the
>                         channel, so d40_config_write() needs to be
>                         called here, as only dma_slave_config() will
>                         carry the information required so as
>                         d40_*_cfg() can make the correct decisions.

The choice between whether a physical or a logical channel is used is
not something that is configurable via dma_slave_config().  And
d40_config_write() only needs that information, and that information is
available in dma_request_channel().  Therefore no more information
relevant to d40_config_write() will be obtained in dma_slave_config().
Hence d40_config_write() can be called in dma_request_channel().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ