linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] mm: Soft-dirty bits for user memory changes tracking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 16 Apr 2013 09:57:53 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] mm: Soft-dirty bits for user memory changes
 tracking

On Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:46:19 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> Well, this is also a thing arch maintainers can do when they feel a
> need to support the feature on their architecture.  To support them at
> that time we should provide them with a) adequate information in an
> easy-to-find place (eg, a nice comment at the site of the reference x86
> implementation) and b) a userspace test app.

and c) a CONFIG symbol (maybe CONFIG_HAVE_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY, maybe in
arch/Kconfig) that they can select to get this feature (so that this
feature then depend on that CONFIG symbol instead of X86).  That way we
don't have to go back and tidy this up when 15 or so architectures
implement it.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped