linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drivers: uio: Fix UIO device registration failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:13:26 +0530
From:	Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	hjk@...sjkoch.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Damian Hobson-Garcia <dhobsong@...l.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: uio: Fix UIO device registration failure

On 26 March 2013 07:17, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:31:22AM +0900, Damian Hobson-Garcia wrote:
>> Until recently uio_get_minor() returned 0 for success and
>> a negative value on failure.  This became non-negative for suceess and
>> negative for failure.  Restore the original return value spec so that we can
>> successfully initialize UIO devices with a non-zero minor device
>> number.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Damian Hobson-Garcia <dhobsong@...l.co.jp>
>> ---
>>  drivers/uio/uio.c |    1 +
>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> Hans, don't you have a bunch of uio patches queued up for me?  I've been
> ignoring them, thinking you are collecting them, is this not true?

Greg, there isn't any response from Hans regarding the UIO patches.
Would you be picking them instead?

-- 
With warm regards,
Sachin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/