lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:44:19 -0700 From: "Pierre-Loup A. Griffais" <pgriffais@...vesoftware.com> To: <hannes@...xchg.org> CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, <riel@...hat.com>, <sonnyrao@...omium.org>, <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: IO regression after ab8fabd46f on x86 kernels with high memory I initially observed this between kernels 3.2 and 3.5: on 3.2, copying a 180M shared object on the same ext4 filesystem takes 0.6s. On 3.5, it takes between two and three minutes. It looks like a similar throughput regression happens on any machine running an i386 PAE kernel with high amounts of memory; the threshold seems to be 16G; passing mem=15G to the kernel commandline fixes it. I bisected it to the following change: commit ab8fabd46f811d5153d8a0cd2fac9a0d41fb593d Author: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com> Date: Tue Jan 10 15:07:42 2012 -0800 mm: exclude reserved pages from dirtyable memory I realize running x86 kernels against high amounts of memory is not advised for various reasons, but I would assume that such a big regression in basic functionality to not be part of them. Is that accurate, or are these configurations expected to become unusable from 3.3 onwards? Also CCing Sonny since it looks like he tried to fix an overflow issue related to the same change with commit c8b74c2f66049, but I'm still experiencing the problem with a kernel built from master. Thanks, - Pierre-Loup -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists