linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the powerpc tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:40:44 +1000
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Vasant Hegde <hegdevasant@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the powerpc tree

On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 11:35 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in
> arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_flash.c between commit ad18a364f186
> ("powerpc/rtas_flash: Free kmem upon module exit"),  from the powerpc
> tree and commit 5c0333c00ff6 ("ppc: Clean up rtas_flash driver
> somewhat")
> from the vfs tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no
> action
> is required).

Please don't merge Dave's rework until it's been acked & fully tested by
us. AFAIK, there are outstanding comments from my guys who
reviewed/tested the first pass.

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/