linux-kernel - Re: sched/cputime: sig->prev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 02 May 2013 09:05:28 -0700
From:	Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
To:	Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
CC:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: sched/cputime: sig->prev_stime underflow

On 04/30/2013 05:36 AM, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 02:05:22PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
>>> But since this (most likely) is rtime monotonicity problem it
>>> is bug by itself and probably that should be fixed. Can you 
>>> check second patch attached and see if it trigger the warning.
>>
>> Yup, it triggers lots of warnings.  Here's one.
>>
>>> [  460.789710] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>> [  460.789730] WARNING: at /home/davehans/linux.git/kernel/sched/cputime.c:563 cputime_adjust+0xe6/0xf0()
>>> [  460.789736] Hardware name: PRIMEQUEST 1800E2
>>> [  460.789739] Modules linked in:
>>> [  460.789745] Pid: 4245, comm: top Tainted: G        W    3.9.0-rc7-00004-gbb33db7-dirty #19
>>> [  460.789748] Call Trace:
>>> [  460.789777]  [<ffffffff810c6dc7>] warn_slowpath_common+0xb7/0x120
>>> [  460.789783]  [<ffffffff810c6e5a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x2a/0x40
>>> [  460.789789]  [<ffffffff8111a8d6>] cputime_adjust+0xe6/0xf0
>>> [  460.789795]  [<ffffffff8111b755>] ? thread_group_cputime+0x5/0x140
>>> [  460.789800]  [<ffffffff8111bbb9>] thread_group_cputime_adjusted+0x59/0x70
> 
> Dave, could you test attached patch and check if make warnings gone.
> Patch is not right fix, but if it prevent the warnings, this will
> give clue where the problem can be.

Does this have any relation to the other four -tip patches you also
posted?  What do you want this applied on top of?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/