linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Make Book E watchdog reset type configurable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 2 May 2013 18:17:41 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Dirk Eibach <dirk.eibach@...ys.cc>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Make Book E watchdog reset type configurable

Hi Dirk,

On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 09:11:19PM +0200, Dirk Eibach wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
> 
> >>diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> >>index e89fc31..6048593 100644
> >>--- a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> >>+++ b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> >>@@ -1172,6 +1172,38 @@ config BOOKE_WDT_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT
> >>
> >> 	  The value can be overridden by the wdt_period command-line
> >>parameter.
> >>
> >>+choice
> >>+	prompt "PowerPC Book-E Watchdog reset type"
> >>+	depends on BOOKE_WDT
> >>+	default BOOKE_WDT_RESET_CHIP
> >>+	help
> >>+	  Specify what kind of reset will be executed on watchdog timeout.
> >>+
> >Seems to me it would be much better to make this configurable via
> >platform data
> >and/or device tree.
> 
> good catch. What do the device-tree gurus think to be a nice
> property name?
> 
How about "reset-type" ? If that is not acceptable, a more device specific
name might be "booke-reset-type".

I would suggest to write a patch including property description and copy
devicetree-discuss when you submit it. If devicetree works for your application,
I would not bother with platform data.

Btw, do you have an opinion about the timeout ? I'd like to get rid of the
configuration parameter, as it is quite confusing (try to match the parameter
to seconds on a Freescale processor and you'll understand what I mean).
I asked about it on the list a while ago, but did not get any feedback.

Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/