linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] extcon: Palmas Extcon Driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 7 May 2013 11:45:02 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Cc:	gg@...mlogic.co.uk, myungjoo.ham@...sung.com,
	cw00.choi@...sung.com, balbi@...com, ldewangan@...dia.com,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, grant.likely@...aro.org,
	rob.herring@...xeda.com, rob@...dley.net, ruchika@...com,
	tony@...mide.com, sameo@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] extcon: Palmas Extcon Driver

On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 03:17:08PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 May 2013 01:28 PM, Mark Brown wrote:

> >>The platform can provide it's own vbus control in which case this is
> >>not needed.

> >So why is there no interaction with this external VBUS control and how
> >does the driver distinguish between that and an error getting the
> >regulator?

> The platform specifies if it provides its own VBUS control by the dt
> property ti,no_control_vbus. So the driver will give an error only
> when *ti,no_control_vbus* is not set. Graeme?

That doesn't answer the question about why there's no interaction with
the external control...

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)