linux-kernel - Re: [uclinux-dist-devel] [GIT PULL] Blackfin updates for 3.10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 10 May 2013 10:27:06 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	"Steven Miao (Steven Miao)" <realmz6@...il.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Bob Liu <lliubbo@...il.com>,
	uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [uclinux-dist-devel] [GIT PULL] Blackfin updates for 3.10

On Thu, 9 May 2013 14:53:42 -0700 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> Hmm. I'm used to pull blackfin updates from Bob Liu. I see that he has
> signed your gpg key, so this all looks fine, but quite frankly, Id'
> much rather be told ahead of time that "oh, expect pulls from another
> person".
> 
> I do *not* want to end up in some kind of fight over who maintains
> what. Bob? Am I supposed to expect blackfin pulls to come from Steven
> now? Or is this a one-off? Or what?

And should this tree be included in linux-next for future work (as well,
or instead of, the current blackfin tree)?

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped