linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] init/Kconfig: Add option to set modprobe command

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 13 May 2013 15:59:47 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] init/Kconfig: Add option to set modprobe command

On 05/10, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
> > On 05/10, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >>
> >> > > -char modprobe_path[KMOD_PATH_LEN] = "/sbin/modprobe";
> >> > > +char modprobe_path[KMOD_PATH_LEN] = "/sbin/modprobe -q --";
> >>
> >> No. This is incompatible change, we shouldn't do this.
> >
> > Exactly. This can break a distro which writes to sys/kernel/modprobe.
> >
> > And if we do not do this, you can simply make a single trivial patch
> > which does
...
> > that it all. (or perhaps a kernel parameter makes more sense).
> >
> > Yes, this doesn't allow to pass the additional arguments, but is it
> > that important?
>
> Yes, because I don't want to simply change the binary to use, I want
> to be able to use a general "kmod" binary that accept a command like
> "load". Next version of kmod will accept things like this (see the
> commit message in patch 3/3):

Well, but a link to the binary which checks argv[0] or a trivial executable
which simply execs "kmod load" looks like the simple workaround. And this
doesn't need to recompile the kernel.

Lucas, I simply do not know...

Andrew, Rusty, what do you think? Can we do the change above? Do we
really want CONFIG_MODPROBE_PATH or a kernel parameter ?

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/