linux-kernel - Re: dynticks: CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING + CONFIG_CONTEXT_TRACKING breaks accounting on core2 CPUs only

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 14 May 2013 02:57:46 +0200
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: dynticks: CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING +  CONFIG_CONTEXT_TRACKING
 breaks accounting on core2 CPUs only

On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 10:17:49AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> Turning on new NO_HZ feature on my Q6600 box in master, I see that tasks
> accrue zero utime/stime.  However, the same exact kernel on E5620 box
> works fine, so it would appear there's a CPU dependency somewhere.

Ah indeed, I just managed to reproduce the same issue.

> 
> Is core2 expected to go dysfunctional with context tracking enabled?
> CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING alone works fine in 3.9-stable, turn on
> CONFIG_CONTEXT_TRACKING_FORCE, and CPU accounting stops working on core2
> boxen only, same exact kernel continues to work just fine on E5620
> (Westmere) box.

There was no known issue with core2. The box where I'm seeing the it
is a Phenom quad core that had NR_CPUS=2. May be the issue is more
likely to happen with this low number. I don't know.

I'm investigating further.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/