linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH for-3.10] workqueue: correct handling of the pool spin

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 14 May 2013 11:48:35 -0700
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-3.10] workqueue: correct handling of the pool
 spin_lock

On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 12:07:00AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> When we fail to mutex_trylock(), we release the pool spin_lock and do
> mutex_lock(). After that, we should regrab the pool spin_lock, but,
> regrabbing is missed in current code. So correct it.
> 
> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>

Applied to wq/for-3.10-fixes.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/