linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 01/11] mtd: add datasheet's ECC information to nand

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 15 May 2013 15:11:57 +0300
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	Huang Shijie <b32955@...escale.com>
Cc:	dwmw2@...radead.org, computersforpeace@...il.com,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/11] mtd: add datasheet's ECC information to
 nand_chip{}

On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 16:40 +0800, Huang Shijie wrote:
> + * @ecc_strength:	[INTERN] ECC correctability from the datasheet.
> + *			Minimum amount of bit errors per @ecc_step guaranteed to
> + *			be correctable. If unknown, set to zero.
> + * @ecc_step:		[INTERN] ECC step required by the @ecc_strength,
> + *                      also from the datasheet. It is the recommended ECC step
> + *			size, if known; if unknown, set to zero.

Here and in other places you talk about "datasheet". Do you assume that
the real ECC strength/step used by NAND chips may be different? Or you
assume it must be the same?

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/