lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 15 May 2013 15:20:35 +0100
From:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To:	Zhang Yi <wetpzy@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	'Thomas Gleixner' <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	'Darren Hart' <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
	'Peter Zijlstra' <peterz@...radead.org>,
	'Ingo Molnar' <mingo@...nel.org>, zhang.yi20@....com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] futex: bugfix for futex-key conflict when futex use
 hugepage

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 09:57:03PM +0800, Zhang Yi wrote:
> The futex-keys of processes share futex determined by page-offset,
> mapping-host, and mapping-index of the user space address. User
> appications using hugepage for futex may lead to futex-key conflict.
> 
> Assume there are two or more futexes in diffrent normal pages of the
> hugepage, and each futex has the same offset in its normal page,
> causing all the futexes have the same futex-key.
> 
> This patch adds the normal page index in the compound page into
> the pgoff of futex-key.
> 
> Steps to reproduce the bug:
> 1. The 1st thread map a file of hugetlbfs, and use the return address
> as the 1st mutex's address, and use the return address with PAGE_SIZE
> added as the 2nd mutex's address.
> 2. The 1st thread initialize the two mutexes with pshared attribute,
> and lock the two mutexes.
> 3. The 1st thread create the 2nd thread, and the 2nd thread block on
> the 1st mutex.
> 4. The 1st thread create the 3rd thread, and the 3rd thread block on
> the 2nd mutex.
> 5. The 1st thread unlock the 2nd mutex, the 3rd thread cannot take
> the 2nd mutex, and may block forever.
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <zhang.yi20@....com.cn>
> Tested-by: Ma Chenggong <ma.chenggong@....com.cn>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Reviewed-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
> Reviewed-by: Liu Dong <liu.dong3@....com.cn>
> Reviewed-by: Cui Yunfeng <cui.yunfeng@....com.cn>
> Reviewed-by: Lu Zhongjun <lu.zhongjun@....com.cn>
> Reviewed-by: Jiang Biao <jiang.biao2@....com.cn>
> 

Did all these people really review it? I just whinged about the last patch
and didn't put a Reviewed-by on it. That said, I don't actually have a
problem with this patch and I assumed it passed your testing so

Reviewed-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>

The others might not agree though.

I note the conversion from int offset to long offset in futex_key appears
to have gotten lost. Is that in a separate cleanup patch now?

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ