lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 16 May 2013 11:10:26 -0400
From:	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Cc:	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gleb@...hat.com
Subject: Drop WARN on AMD lack of perfctrs

Hi All,

If you boot a KVM guest on an AMD family 15h and specify -cpu host,
you'll get the following splat:

[    0.031000] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[    0.031000] WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c:772
amd_pmu_init+0x18c/0x249()
[    0.031000] Hardware name: Bochs
[    0.031000] Odd, counter constraints enabled but no core perfctrs
detected!
[    0.031000] Modules linked in:

[    0.031000] Pid: 1, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted
3.9.0-0.rc1.git0.4.fc19.x86_64 #1
[    0.031000] Call Trace:
[    0.031000]  [<ffffffff81d10c67>] ? amd_pmu_init+0x18c/0x249
[    0.031000]  [<ffffffff8105c9a0>] warn_slowpath_common+0x70/0xa0
[    0.031000]  [<ffffffff81d106b3>] ? check_bugs+0x2d/0x2d
[    0.031000]  [<ffffffff8105ca1c>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4c/0x50
[    0.031000]  [<ffffffff81d10c67>] amd_pmu_init+0x18c/0x249
[    0.031000]  [<ffffffff81d106e7>] init_hw_perf_events+0x34/0x428
[    0.031000]  [<ffffffff81d106b3>] ? check_bugs+0x2d/0x2d
[    0.031000]  [<ffffffff8100210a>] do_one_initcall+0x10a/0x160
[    0.031000]  [<ffffffff81d06fa5>] kernel_init_freeable+0xcf/0x1fa
[    0.031000]  [<ffffffff81629800>] ? rest_init+0x80/0x80
[    0.031000]  [<ffffffff8162980e>] kernel_init+0xe/0x190
[    0.031000]  [<ffffffff8164e22c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[    0.031000]  [<ffffffff81629800>] ? rest_init+0x80/0x80
[    0.031000] ---[ end trace a1e57d3cb8668105 ]---

That seems a bit excessive, and it gets picked up by auto-reporting
tools like ABRT as a bug.  Can we remove the WARN and just use pr_err or
something else instead?

josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ