lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 18 May 2013 17:02:25 +0200
From:	André Hentschel <nerv@...ncrow.de>
To:	"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Jonathan Austin <jonathan.austin@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4] arm: Preserve the user r/w register TPIDRURW on context
 switch and fork

Am 08.05.2013 21:03, schrieb André Hentschel:
> From: =?UTF-8?q?Andr=C3=A9=20Hentschel?= <nerv@...ncrow.de>
> 
> Since commit 6a1c53124aa1 the user writeable TLS register was zeroed to
> prevent it from being used as a covert channel between two tasks.
> 
> There are more and more applications coming to WinRT, Wine could support them,
> but mostly they expect to have the thread environment block (TEB) in TPIDRURW.
> 
> This patch preserves that register per thread instead of clearing it.
> Unlike the TPIDRURO, which is already switched, the TPIDRURW
> can be updated from userspace so needs careful treatment in the case that we
> modify TPIDRURW and call fork(). To avoid this we must always read
> TPIDRURW in copy_thread.
> 
> Signed-off-by: André Hentschel <nerv@...ncrow.de>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Austin <jonathan.austin@....com> 
> 

Hi,
I'm not yet very familiar with the development process here,
am i getting no feedback on v4 because of the mergewindow being closed?
Or is there another reason? Sry for being impatient.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ