linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] x86: oops on uaccess faults outside of user addresses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 28 May 2013 10:54:35 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	luto@...capital.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	trinity@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] x86: oops on uaccess faults outside of user addresses


* David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 10:25:14 +0200
> 
> > 
> > * David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> > 
> >> Please don't mix networking and non-networking changes into a patch
> >> series.
> > 
> > As explained in 0/5 the networking fix justifies the first 4 patches. The 
> > networking fix is independent of the first 4 patches.
> > 
> >> Submit the networking patch to netdev@...r.kernel.org
> > 
> > He Cc:-ed the patch to netdev@...r.kernel.org. If you agree with it then 
> > the fix should probably be picked up ASAP.
> 
> He submitted it as part of a series which implies that it belongs together
> with the others.

And then described it in the 0/5 patch that it's not. It's also visible 
from the title, the changelog and the diff of the 5/5 patch that it's a 
separate fix.

So please consider it submitted.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/