lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 28 May 2013 06:00:30 -0700
From:	tip-bot for Dan Carpenter <tipbot@...or.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, acme@...hat.com, eranian@...gle.com,
	hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
	jolsa@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, dan.carpenter@...cle.com
Subject: [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel:
  Prevent some shift wrapping bugs in the Intel uncore driver

Commit-ID:  13acac307528c9cd7dd9fa9c577419401527b464
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/13acac307528c9cd7dd9fa9c577419401527b464
Author:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
AuthorDate: Sat, 18 May 2013 21:34:52 +0300
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 28 May 2013 09:13:52 +0200

perf/x86/intel: Prevent some shift wrapping bugs in the Intel uncore driver

We're trying to use 64 bit masks but the shifts wrap so we can't use the
high 32 bits. I've fixed this by changing several types to unsigned
long long.

This is a static checker fix.  The one change which is clearly needed is
"mask = 0xff << (idx * 8);" where the author obviously intended to use
all 64 bits.  The other changes are mostly to silence my static checker.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130518183452.GA14587@elgon.mountain
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c | 4 ++--
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
index 52441a2..c0e356d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
@@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ snbep_pcu_get_constraint(struct intel_uncore_box *box, struct perf_event *event)
 	    (!uncore_box_is_fake(box) && reg1->alloc))
 		return NULL;
 again:
-	mask = 0xff << (idx * 8);
+	mask = 0xffULL << (idx * 8);
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&er->lock, flags);
 	if (!__BITS_VALUE(atomic_read(&er->ref), idx, 8) ||
 	    !((config1 ^ er->config) & mask)) {
@@ -1923,7 +1923,7 @@ static u64 nhmex_mbox_alter_er(struct perf_event *event, int new_idx, bool modif
 {
 	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
 	struct hw_perf_event_extra *reg1 = &hwc->extra_reg;
-	int idx, orig_idx = __BITS_VALUE(reg1->idx, 0, 8);
+	u64 idx, orig_idx = __BITS_VALUE(reg1->idx, 0, 8);
 	u64 config = reg1->config;
 
 	/* get the non-shared control bits and shift them */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h
index f952891..47b3d00 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h
@@ -337,10 +337,10 @@
 		 NHMEX_M_PMON_CTL_SET_FLAG_SEL_MASK)
 
 #define NHMEX_M_PMON_ZDP_CTL_FVC_MASK		(((1 << 11) - 1) | (1 << 23))
-#define NHMEX_M_PMON_ZDP_CTL_FVC_EVENT_MASK(n)	(0x7 << (11 + 3 * (n)))
+#define NHMEX_M_PMON_ZDP_CTL_FVC_EVENT_MASK(n)	(0x7ULL << (11 + 3 * (n)))
 
 #define WSMEX_M_PMON_ZDP_CTL_FVC_MASK		(((1 << 12) - 1) | (1 << 24))
-#define WSMEX_M_PMON_ZDP_CTL_FVC_EVENT_MASK(n)	(0x7 << (12 + 3 * (n)))
+#define WSMEX_M_PMON_ZDP_CTL_FVC_EVENT_MASK(n)	(0x7ULL << (12 + 3 * (n)))
 
 /*
  * use the 9~13 bits to select event If the 7th bit is not set,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ