linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM: PPC: Add support for IOMMU in-kernel handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 29 May 2013 10:20:41 +1000
From:	Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>
To:	Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
CC:	David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org,
	Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM: PPC: Add support for IOMMU in-kernel handling

On 05/29/2013 02:32 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 05/24/2013 09:45:24 PM, David Gibson wrote:
>> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 04:06:57PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
>> > On 05/20/2013 10:06:46 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> > >diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
>> > >index 8465c2a..da6bf61 100644
>> > >--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
>> > >@@ -396,6 +396,7 @@ int kvm_dev_ioctl_check_extension(long ext)
>> > >+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
>> > >         break;
>> > > #endif
>> > >     case KVM_CAP_SPAPR_MULTITCE:
>> > >+    case KVM_CAP_SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU:
>> > >         r = 1;
>> > >         break;
>> > >     default:
>> >
>> > Don't advertise SPAPR capabilities if it's not book3s -- and
>> > probably there's some additional limitation that would be
>> > appropriate.
>>
>> So, in the case of MULTITCE, that's not quite right.  PR KVM can
>> emulate a PAPR system on a BookE machine, and there's no reason not to
>> allow TCE acceleration as well.
> 
> That might (or might not; consider things like Altivec versus SPE opcode
> conflict, whether unimplemented SPRs trap, behavior of unprivileged
> SPRs/instructions, etc) be true in theory, but it's not currently a
> supported configuration.  BookE KVM does not support emulating a different
> CPU than the host.  In the unlikely case that ever changes to the point of
> allowing PAPR guests on a BookE host, then we can revisit how to properly
> determine whether the capability is supported, but for now the capability
> will never be valid in the CONFIG_BOOKE case (though I'd rather see it
> depend on an appropriate book3s symbol than depend on !BOOKE).
> 
> Or we could just leave it as is, and let it indicate whether the host
> kernel supports the feature in general, with the user needing to understand
> when it's applicable...  I'm a bit confused by the documentation, however
> -- the MULTITCE capability was documented in the "capabilities that can be
> enabled" section, but I don't see where it can be enabled.


True, it cannot be enabled (but it could be enabled a long time ago), it is
either supported or not, I'll fix the documentation. Thanks!


-- 
Alexey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/