linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net: skbuff: use _RET_IP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 30 May 2013 18:11:28 -0700
From:	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>
To:	Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
Cc:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: skbuff: use _RET_IP_

On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 13:08 +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com> writes:
> 
> >     Why not "text:%#lx" as already used in this string? It's
> > equivalent to "0x%lx".
> 
> Well, I don't know the reasoning in this case, but I'd like to note that
> those are not strictly equivalent.  Personally I find the formatting of 0
> annoying enough to avoid %#x for any value which may be 0.  It's
> especially bad if you try to line up things by adding leading zeros.

Yep, I found that 0x%lx produced the same output as %p. If you'd rather
I use something else instead, I'm happy to update the patch.

Thanks,
Davidlohr

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/