linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/3] workqueue: code refine in wqattrs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 5 Jun 2013 00:21:06 -0700
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/3] workqueue: code refine in wqattrs_equal()

On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 03:14:04PM +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
> code refine to save some line.
> 
> CC: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  kernel/workqueue.c |    5 ++---
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index ee8e29a..5fd4791 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -3417,9 +3417,8 @@ static bool wqattrs_equal(const struct workqueue_attrs *a,
>  {
>  	if (a->nice != b->nice)
>  		return false;
> -	if (!cpumask_equal(a->cpumask, b->cpumask))
> -		return false;
> -	return true;
> +
> +	return cpumask_equal(a->cpumask, b->cpumask);

I don't know.  I kinda like the current form because we can add new
attributes easily without modifying existing lines.  The suggested
patch is frivolous.  It doesn't really improve anything.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/