linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v1] add new io-scheduler to use cgroup on high-speed device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 05 Jun 2013 11:26:48 +0800
From:	sanbai <sanbai@...bao.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Zhu Yanhai <gaoyang.zyh@...bao.com>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Tao Ma <taoma.tm@...il.com>, kent.overstreet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v1] add new io-scheduler to use cgroup on high-speed device

On 2013年06月05日 11:03, Tejun Heo wrote:
> (cc'ing Kent.  Original posting at
>   http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1502484 )
>
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 10:09:31AM +0800, Robin Dong wrote:
>> We want to use blkio.cgroup on high-speed device (like fusionio) for our mysql clusters.
>> After testing different io-scheduler, we found that  cfq is too slow and deadline can't run on cgroup.
>> So we developed a new io-scheduler: tpps (Tiny Parallel Proportion Scheduler).It dispatch requests
>> only by using their individual weight and total weight (proportion) therefore it's simply and efficient.
>>
>> Test case: fusionio card, 4 cgroups, iodepth-512
> So, while I understand the intention behind it, I'm not sure a
> separate io-sched for this is what we want.  Kent and Jens have been
> thinking about this lately so they'll probably chime in.  From my POV,
> I see a few largish issues.
>
> * It has to be scalable with relatively large scale SMP / NUMA
>    configurations.  It better integrate with blk-mq support currently
>    being brewed.
Ok, I will go on to look Jens's blk-mq branch.

>
> * It definitely has to support hierarchy.  Nothing which doesn't
>    support full hierarchy can be added to cgroup at this point.
Thanks for your note, hierarchy supporting will be added in my next 
version patch.
>
> * We already have separate implementations in blk-throtl and
>    cfq-iosched.  Maybe it's too late and too different for cfq-iosched
>    given that it's primarily targeted at disks, but I wonder whether we
>    can make blk-throtl generic and scalable enough to cover all other
>    use cases.
I have the same feeling. Let's wait other person's response.
>
> Thanks.
>


-- 

Robin Dong
董昊（花名：三百）
阿里巴巴 集团 核心系统部 内核组
分机：72370
手机：13520865473
email：sanbai@...bao.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/