[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 10:03:39 +0100
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
<konrad.wilk@...cle.com>, <will.deacon@....com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 5/6] arm64/xen: introduce CONFIG_XEN on
ARM64
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 18:02 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Changes in v4:
> - build the entire arch/arm/xen directory under arch/arm64, ifdef
> hypercall.S appropriately.
This is probably the best (or equal first) of a bunch of bad options :-/
> + * The Xen hypercall calling convention is very similar to the ARM/ARM64
> + * procedure calling convention: the first paramter is passed in r0/x0,
"parameter"
> + * the second in r1/x1, the third in r2/x2 and the fourth in r3/x3.
> + * Considering that Xen hypercalls have 5 arguments at most, the fifth
> + * paramter is always passed in r4/x4, differently from the ARM
> + * procedure calling convention of using the stack for that case.
and "parameter" again.
Strictly speaking the fifth argument handling only differs from the
32-bit PCS, not the 64-bit one. Splitting hairs a bit there.
If you fix the typo and clarify the fifth argument or not as you wish:
Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
Ian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists