linux-kernel - Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 07 Jun 2013 21:16:58 +0200
From:	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
To:	"luke.leighton" <luke.leighton@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Linux on small ARM machines 
	<arm-netbook@...ts.phcomp.co.uk>,
	devicetree-discuss <devicetree-discuss@...abs.org>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	debian-arm@...ts.debian.org,
	"jonsmirl@...il.com" <jonsmirl@...il.com>,
	debian-kernel@...ts.debian.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

On Friday 07 of June 2013 20:02:03 luke.leighton wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com> 
wrote:
> >Seeing from your posts you don't have any knowledge on how Linux kernel
> >
> > development works
> 
>  check back to 2004.

$ git log --oneline --author="Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton" | wc -l
0
$ git log --oneline --author="lkcl@...l.net" | wc -l
0
$ git log --oneline --author="Luke Leighton" | wc -l
0

That's an -ENOPATCH for me.

> > and even on how Allwinner's cooperation with our
> > community looks (and seem to be completely closed to our effort of
> > showing you the reality),
> 
>  no - just f*****g busy, tomasz

Just like many of us, I guess.

> > so I'm not sure if you are the right person to take any
> > of those roles...
> 
>  well, tough.  get me up to speed, *fast*.  please stop wasting time
> like this: get me up to speed.  i may not be the best person but i am
> in the right place at the right time, and nobody else is going to be
> able to step into this role in time.
> 
>  so i may not be the best person that you *think* i am, but i'm the
> person you've got.  time's ticking.  can we get on please?
> 
> > I'd suggest Maxime Ripard or someone else from Free Electrons to be
> > responsible for communication with Allwinner instead.
> 
>  you're welcome to suggest, however they do not have the contacts that
> i have (many of which are indirect anyway), and i am not going to
> introduce him to them either, in case they jeapordise the critical
> business relationships that took my associates 4 years to establish.

Well, I'm quitting this discussion right now, as it doesn't seem to be of 
any use or might be even counter-productive. I have already showed my view 
on this matter (and even given you some proposals for them), got it 
confirmed by several other people and got nothing from you that could make 
me reconsider anything.

Thank you for your time.

Best regards,
Tomasz

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/