lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 08 Jun 2013 19:30:21 +0800
From:	"weiqi@...inos.com.cn" <weiqi@...inos.com.cn>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC:	"weiqi@...inos.com.cn" <weiqi@...inos.com.cn>,
	torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: race condition in schedule_on_each_cpu()

Hello Tejun Heo,

I've backported the  schedule_on_each_cpu()  "direct excution" patch on 
3.0.30-rt50,
and  It  fixed my problem.

attachment is the effective patch.

However, I do not understand why  machine1 can expose problem,  but 
machine2 not.

I guess, because it's  rt-kernel's  preempt level related, so , is this 
difference due to cpu performance?

How do you think about this ?

Thank you~

View attachment "direct_execution.patch" of type "text/plain" (1171 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ