linux-kernel - Re: [EXAMPLE PATCH] pinctrl: add pinctrl driver for Rockchip SoCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:00:41 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
Cc:	Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard.st@...il.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [EXAMPLE PATCH] pinctrl: add pinctrl driver for Rockchip SoCs

On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de> wrote:

(...)
> +#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h>

Hm I don't know if we're supposed to do things like this actually.

It depends on whether the <dt-bindings/*> hierarchy is supposed
to stay in the kernel after the device trees are moved out to a
separate repo.

Grant/Rob, shall we do this in drivers?

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/