lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 10 Jun 2013 17:22:09 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
Cc:	"'Jason Gunthorpe'" <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	"'Thomas Petazzoni'" <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	"'Siva Reddy Kallam'" <siva.kallam@...sung.com>,
	"'Surendranath Gurivireddy Balla'" <suren.reddy@...sung.com>,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	"'Thierry Reding'" <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"'Grant Likely'" <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	"'Kukjin Kim'" <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	"'Thomas Abraham'" <thomas.abraham@...aro.org>,
	"'Bjorn Helgaas'" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	"'Andrew Murray'" <andrew.murray@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] ARM: dts: Add pcie controller node for Samsung EXYNOS5440 SoC

On Monday 10 June 2013, Jingoo Han wrote:
> On Saturday, June 08, 2013 2:43 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> For multiple domains, how can I fix the DT properties?

Domains are a Linux concept, you have to pick a new domain number for each
struct hw_pci you register.
 
> Current DT properties are as below:
> 
> +	pcie0@...00000 {
> +		compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-pcie";
> +		reg = <0x40000000 0x4000
> +			0x290000 0x1000
> +			0x270000 0x1000
> +			0x271000 0x40>;
> +		interrupts = <0 20 0>, <0 21 0>, <0 22 0>;
> +		#address-cells = <3>;
> +		#size-cells = <2>;
> +		device_type = "pci";
> +		ranges = <0x00000800 0 0x40000000 0x40000000 0 0x00200000   /* configuration space */
> +			  0x81000000 0 0	  0x40200000 0 0x00004000   /* downstream I/O */
> +			  0x82000000 0 0	  0x40204000 0 0x10000000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */
> +	};

An unrelated comment: your first "reg" field seems to overlap with part
of your configuration space. Is that intentional?

Also, shouldn't your memory space end on a 256MB boundary, rather than
extend up to 0x50203fff?

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ