lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:03:28 +0200
From:	Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocky" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>,
	Jonghwa Lee <jonghwa3.lee@...sung.com>,
	Myungjoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...ess.pl>,
	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@...aro.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] cpufreq:exynos:Extend Exynos cpufreq driver to support
 boost framework

The struct cpufreq_driver has been extended to embrace the information
related to boost support.

When "boost_mode" device tree attribute is defined for a platform, the
low_level_boost pointer is filled with proper address. The
.low_level_boost field filled to NULL, indicates that boost is not
supported.

Operations of exynos_cpufreq_boost_trigger() function are protected with
"local" mutex.

Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>
Signed-off-by: Myungjoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>

---
Changes for v2:
- Removal of struct cpufreq_boost
- Removal of the CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_BOOST flag
- low_level_boost with valid address when boost is supported
---
 drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c |   49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
index 3197d88..8cf5636 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
 static unsigned int locking_frequency;
 static bool frequency_locked;
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(cpufreq_lock);
+static struct cpufreq_cpuinfo *cpufreq_cpu_info;
 
 static int exynos_verify_speed(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {
@@ -154,6 +155,7 @@ out:
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static struct cpufreq_driver exynos_driver;
 static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 			  unsigned int target_freq,
 			  unsigned int relation)
@@ -244,6 +246,9 @@ static struct notifier_block exynos_cpufreq_nb = {
 
 static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {
+	unsigned int max_freq;
+	int ret;
+
 	policy->cur = policy->min = policy->max = exynos_getspeed(policy->cpu);
 
 	cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(exynos_info->freq_table, policy->cpu);
@@ -253,7 +258,19 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 
 	cpumask_setall(policy->cpus);
 
-	return cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy, exynos_info->freq_table);
+	ret = cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy, exynos_info->freq_table);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (exynos_driver.low_level_boost) {
+		/* disable boost by default */
+		max_freq = cpufreq_frequency_table_max(exynos_info->freq_table,
+						       0);
+		policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = policy->max = max_freq;
+		cpufreq_cpu_info = &policy->cpuinfo;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
@@ -264,9 +281,32 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 
 static struct freq_attr *exynos_cpufreq_attr[] = {
 	&cpufreq_freq_attr_scaling_available_freqs,
+	&cpufreq_freq_attr_boost_available_freqs,
 	NULL,
 };
 
+static int exynos_cpufreq_boost_trigger(int state)
+{
+	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = container_of(cpufreq_cpu_info,
+						     struct cpufreq_policy,
+						     cpuinfo);
+	unsigned int max_freq;
+
+	mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock);
+	exynos_driver.boost_en = state;
+
+	/* Recalculate maximal frequency */
+	max_freq = cpufreq_frequency_table_max(exynos_info->freq_table,
+					       exynos_driver.boost_en);
+
+	if (policy->max != max_freq)
+		policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = policy->max = max_freq;
+
+	mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_lock);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static struct cpufreq_driver exynos_driver = {
 	.flags		= CPUFREQ_STICKY,
 	.verify		= exynos_verify_speed,
@@ -275,7 +315,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver exynos_driver = {
 	.init		= exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init,
 	.exit		= exynos_cpufreq_cpu_exit,
 	.name		= "exynos_cpufreq",
-	.attr		= exynos_cpufreq_attr,
+	.attr	= exynos_cpufreq_attr,
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM
 	.suspend	= exynos_cpufreq_suspend,
 	.resume		= exynos_cpufreq_resume,
@@ -359,6 +399,8 @@ static struct of_device_id exynos_cpufreq_of_match[] __initconst = {
 
 static int __init exynos_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
+	struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
+
 	int ret = -EINVAL;
 
 	exynos_info = kzalloc(sizeof(struct exynos_dvfs_info), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -391,6 +433,9 @@ static int __init exynos_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 
 	locking_frequency = exynos_getspeed(0);
+	if (of_property_read_bool(node, "boost_mode"))
+		exynos_driver.low_level_boost =
+			&exynos_cpufreq_boost_trigger;
 
 	register_pm_notifier(&exynos_cpufreq_nb);
 
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ