lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:37:15 +0200
From:	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] irqchip: add support for Marvell Orion SoCs

On 06/11/13 15:30, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 6 Jun 2013, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>>
>>> This patch adds an irqchip driver for the main interrupt controller found
>>> on Marvell Orion SoCs (Kirkwood, Dove, Orion5x, Discovery Innovation).
>>> Corresponding device tree documentation is also added.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>
> Second thoughts:
>
>> +static void orion_bridge_irq_handler(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
>> +{
>> +	struct irq_domain *d = irq_get_handler_data(irq);
>> +	struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_get_domain_generic_chip(d, irq);
>> +	u32 stat = readl_relaxed(gc->reg_base + ORION_BRIDGE_IRQ_CAUSE) &
>> +		gc->mask_cache;
>
> In init you map the first irq of that chip and install the chain
> handler for it. Now if that first irq fires, isn't that set in the
> cause register as well? And what acks that first irq?

It is "acked" by acking all unmasked bridge irqs.

Sebastian

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ