lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 11 Jun 2013 08:22:22 +0100
From:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To:	linux-efi@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
	Zach Bobroff <zacharyb@....com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, efi: retry ExitBootServices() on failure

On Tue, 11 Jun, at 07:52:38AM, Matt Fleming wrote:
> From: Zach Bobroff <zacharyb@....com>
> 
> ExitBootServices is absolutely supposed to return a failure if any
> ExitBootServices event handler changes the memory map.  Basically the
> get_map loop should run again if ExitBootServices returns an error the
> first time.  I would say it would be fair that if ExitBootServices gives
> an error the second time then Linux would be fine in returning control
> back to BIOS.
> 
> The second change is the following line:
> 
> again:
>         size += sizeof(*mem_map) * 2;
> 
> Originally you were incrementing it by the size of one memory map entry.
> The issue here is all related to the low_alloc routine you are using.
> In this routine you are making allocations to get the memory map itself.
> Doing this allocation or allocations can affect the memory map by more
> than one record.
> 
> [ mfleming - changelog, code style ]
> Signed-off-by: Zach Bobroff <zacharyb@....com>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

I've queued this patch up for v3.11 in my 'next' branch.

-- 
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ